Libros de Segunda Mano – Religión: Complot contra la iglesia maurice pinay edit mundo libre año 21,3×15,7×4,2cms. Compra, venta y subastas de. Libros de Segunda Mano – Religión: Complot contra la iglesia. maurice pinay. ed . mundo libre, mexico. 2ª ed. pp.. Compra, venta y subastas de. The English translation of the Complot contra la Iglesia is not as polished as one would like. Whilst the rendering of many passages may at times appear rather.
|Published (Last):||15 May 2017|
|PDF File Size:||8.76 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||5.20 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
More than a millennium worth of teaching, and knowledge distilled from hard experience, was jettisoned without ilesia. Active efforts to convert Jews were abandoned. They just call God by different names! But while the Council was in igllesia, an extraordinary last-minute effort was made to avert this final capitulation of the Catholic Church before Jewry.
One passage is enough to illustrate this: Impressions of a Struggle of Minds E. As well as covering contemporary topics such as Communism, it goes into the deep history of the conflict between Christendom and Jewry, elaborated over the centuries as a struggle between the Christian church and vicious Jewish adversaries who foment heresies in order mauricee weaken and confound it.
Smith was involved in trying to gain an audience for the book.
Louis Review, July 30 that Gerald L. But who was the author? Maurice Pinay had never been heard from before and was never heard from again. How was he able to produce a work that was clearly the product of profound study, translate it into multiple languages, print thousands of copies of it all the bishops attending the council got one and somehow distribute it inside the Vatican during a secret conclave? The book was distributed in Italian but there are reports and indications that it was originally written in Spanish.
Various sources claim it was written by a group rather than an individual.
Ottaviani was the head of the Holy Office, successor to the inquisition. News reports at the time of the council almost invariably hostile depict him as a hard reactionary holding out against the tide of liberal change.
Plot Against the Church by Maurice Pinay
He was outspokenly opposed to almost every change brought about by the council and fought the losing battle against most of them with all the considerable resources at his disposal. Here is an extract:.
Let us examine pictures which have appeared in communications media of Paul VI with the Pectoral of Judaism and the Ephod cintra the great Levite priest of Judaism … therein, may be a decisive key. Notice the unorthodox ritual sign above the chest of the Pope and keep in mind the current subversion of the Church, the confessed infiltration of the Jews, Masons, and Communists into the clergy. I believe we have the right … even the obligation … to ask this question: Montini a true Catholic … or, is he an infiltrator, a Jewish director for the Mafia?
I have been suspicious for some time. Now, I have near-certain evidence that Paul VI is not a legitimate Pope, but an anti-Pope … a trained Jew, employed by the Mafia to use diabolical but undiscerned methods, employing time, money and the unquestionable ability piinay those who have always dreamed of dominating the World.
The New Montini Church.
According to the pontifical teaching of such eminent prelates as Msgr. Not only do we recall Stanistas Guaita, the economist Roca of St. It is a shame that these warnings, condemnations and revealing records were not heeded by our ecclesiastics or faithful Pniay. These generally have the same tenour as the Maurice Majrice book. Why persist in pretending it was a third party? It was only the publication of this very book that earned him excommunication.
Complotto contro la Chiesa
This helped start an entire movement, known as sedevacantism, a kind of Alt Catholic Church, which continues to this day, of diehard Catholics waiting for the Vatican to unJew itself and return to its true nature.
To me, these appear very much like works of the same author. The only proof it cites of this claim is the following text which appeared on a Spanish edition of the work. This hardly seems definitive proof of authorship. The Autonomous University of Guadalajara was a private university founded in protest against the efforts of the Mexican government to control education and supposedly infuse it with Marxist indoctrination.
El Yunque is alleged to be a secret far-right paramilitary organisation in Mexico, which is said to have carried out political assassinations operating through various front groups.
It has also been active in Spain. Carlos Cuesta Gallardo was one of the most influential Teco members. Until the s, Los Tecos were very close to the Catholic Church. This situation reached one of its highest points during establishment of the Vatican II Council in The Tecos rejected this Council and argued that the Catholic Church had been infiltrated by communists and, particularly, the Jews.
In it, the organisation blamed Jews and communists for almost everything in history. Subsequently, the Tecos became more violent.
The latter focuses mainly on analysing ilesia connections between Jews and Communism. It does strongly resemble the Plot Against the Church in parts, without demonstrating quite the same depth of historical or theological understanding. However, both books could certainly be by the same author. But if Los Tecos wrote and published the Plot Against the Church, how did they get the kind of clout to have it distributed inside the Vatican during the Second Council?
Guadalajara did indeed become the one of the principal powerbases for sedevacantism so this is igelsia implausible. But you live and learn. That said, Los Tecos were obviously not your average pistoleros. They were clearly highly intellectual and impregnated with a sense of spirituality. A new group, called Yunque, which accepted the reforms, emerged; while diehard Tecos denounced Pope Paul VI as a Communist and Jew and became kaurice intensively violent.
This raises an intriguing question. His exact role or function there is unknown.
Some say he was a secretary to Hitler; others say he was a confidant of Alfred Rosenberg, the Nazi ideologue who formulated the German anti-Jewish policy and who was executed at Nuremberg. Cuesta Gallardo settled in Guadalajara, the financial center of Mexico and its second-largest city; it is as well the historical home of the Cristeros.
His house is a disguised fortress, well-guarded all the time. Cuesta Gallardo was not idle in his Guadalajara lair. He envisioned a renaissance of the Tecos, this time committed not only to fighting the anti-clerics in Mexico but also to battling all enemies wherever they existed throughout the world.
Those enemies included the United States, Jews, Freemasons, and most of the hierarchy of the Vatican Church, for they were all, according to Cuesta Gallardo, conspirators in the Jewish-Freemason-Communist plot to take over the world. These Catholic clerics had collaborated with Germany and its allies during the war; many were not priests but were regular war criminals who, with Church assistance, had donned robes to facilitate their escape. They were now scattered throughout Western Europe and Latin America.
Cuesta recruited a young Mexican intellectual, Raimundo Guerrero, to his cause. Guerrero succeeded in drawing other right-wing students and academics into the Teco cabal and in time assumed its overt leadership. The real power, however, would always remain with the shadowy Cuesta.
There he made contact with other neo-Nazi student groups from around the world. In addition to forging a lasting relationship with the anti-Israel Arab League, it was in Buenos Aires that Guerrero came into contact with the Jesuit priest Julio Meinveille. Jews, Freemasons, and liberal elements of the Catholic Church.
ByMeinveille was already the spiritual leader of the Tacuaras, an Argentine secret society of neo-Nazis, and he would become the same for the Tecos.
Stefan Possony a professor emeritus at ppinay conservative Hoover Institute at Stanford University and a longtime American League member, investigated the Tecos in the early s. He is a theologian with knowledge in the social sciences, and contrra is far more scholarly and also more moderate than the rest.
He is knowledgable on many aspects of Communism, about which he wrote with wisdom and insight. He produced the overarching interpretation of history on which the reasoning of the Tecos literature is based. But he has also been the victim of obsessive ideas, especially anti-Semitism, in the pursuit of which he resorted to questionable methods.
To them, practically all established leaders, whether in the religious, economic, or political fields were traitors and tools of international Zionism. Franklin Roosevelt, Harry S. So too, were several leaders laa the Spanish Carlists, a movement best known for its ardent Catholicism and unwavering support of Generalissimo Francisco Franco, and so were conservative and Igkesia politicians throughout South and Central America.
The Tecos saw and continue to see all their enemies as performing assigned roles toward the secret Jewish plan of global domination. The Complot remains one of the most scathingly anti-Semitic and unabashedly pro-Nazi tracts ever written. We must join forces against Jewish imperialism and liberate our own peoples, all who are being kept captive by Jews, so that after victory over the worst imperialism the world has ever seen … all countries can form a world organization.
Many journalists and shocked Church leaders attempted to discover the true identity of the author of the Complot; they came to the conclusion that it was a collaborative effort of European neo-Nazis and Latin American fascists. Actual responsibility, however, belonged to the Tecos, specifically Cuesta Gallardo and Garibi Velasco, another Teco leader; they were its major authors. The parting was not amicable.
To the Tecos, the Pueblas had now proven themselves to be part of the Jewish conspiracy. Neither group is composed of saints. So how you could assert a copyright over this is beyond me. Did you do an original translation from the Spanish? It is my edition. My typesetting, my foreword, afterword, extra mateials, et al. That cover is copyrighted as I created it for my edition.
Complotto contro la Chiesa – Wikipedia
Either use the original cover from pina s, if you want or make a new one. Or put a link to my work. Maybe I can take the works of Shakespeare, the paintings of Leonardo da Vinci, add some lame text in Photoshop to it and claim copyright over it all? It is out of copyright. The text can be used by anyone. An edition is created by adding new content, typrography, etc. As you should well know, in spite of your evasions and trying to shift the blame.
You sound like the people you pillory all the time.